I think the fact that you, and Peter, have worked out an equation, may seriously affect Peter's, and your, ability to find a girlfriend... because there was no factor for no. of women who find geeks sexy...maybe rethink FW and FH...?j
Maths make me want to vomit, even when it is funny maths.Maybe that is a factor?
"No factor for no." THAT is basically the problem isn't it?CR: tis a good thing you're counselling not doing the sums...
Hey! Don't you ominous ...... me. Maybe you should swap 'grumpy' for 'smart arse' ?:)
not to rain on the parade or anything, but what about Fs (fraction of women who are straight) somewhere right after Fh. that might reduce the number somewhat, I know, I'm sorry...:)
perhaps if you were more caring and responsible... the dog has run off and you are too caught up in your singleness to notice. or care.
Flashdot, I think in 2010, one can probably be a little less prescriptive about where on the continuum of sexuality Prozac might find his mate. Your additional category is probably covered by Fb isn't it?X: not my dog.
I did A level maths and I see a flaw in your calculations! On top of the 3 and a half, you forgot to:- add 3,000 women who are on holiday at the moment;- subtract 1,400 who are currently sectioned but who otherwise fit all the necessary criteria;- divide that by the number of women who do in fact find geeks sexy;- subtract from the remainder those in relationships (although 4.8 of those would shag you if they weren't);...and woohoo! you're left with....oh. 3 and a half.
I think this formula still leaves plenty of room for divine intervention.
Why limit this to London?Presumably Prozac sometimes has a miserable little holiday elsewhere.
you're one in a million
Hear hear. I don't understand why you haven't been snapped up long since.
When you say 'you', you mean 'him', yeah?[writes cheery cartoonist, happily married with children]
Post a Comment
Enter your email address:
Subscribe in a reader